File Name: some thoughts on education and political priorities dominic cummings .zip
You have to sympathise with Dominic Cummings, education secretary Michael Gove's outgoing adviser, although I suspect there are many in the educational establishment who do not. He has recently produced an astonishing paper entitled " Some thoughts on education and political priorities " which, for all its breadth and depth, fails to come up with any substantive or practical ideas for how a government should go about the business of providing a public education system. And the reason for this, I suspect, is a failure to come to grips with a fundamental contradiction that lies at the heart of his thinking.
From to , he was a special adviser to Michael Gove , including the time that Gove served as Education Secretary , leaving when Gove was made Chief Whip in a cabinet reshuffle. From to , Cummings was director of Vote Leave , an organisation which successfully executed the referendum campaign for Britain's exit from the European Union. Cummings had a contentious relationship with Chancellor Sajid Javid which culminated in Javid's resignation in February after he refused to comply with Cummings's request to dismiss his special advisers. In May , two leaders of opposition parties called for Cummings to resign after it was reported that he travelled to his parents' farm in Durham during the COVID pandemic lockdown. After he gave the reasons for his journey at a press conference in the garden of 10 and 11 Downing Street , Prime Minister Johnson supported his chief adviser by saying Cummings had acted "responsibly, legally and with integrity". Cummings was born in Durham on 25 November His father, Robert, had a varied career, primarily as an oil rig project manager for Laing ,  the construction firm.
If Gove's tenure has been marked by anything it is urgency. How then is he qualified to lay out such a sweeping vision for education, government and, by extension, the world? The skills, and approach to problems, of our best mathematicians, scientists, and entrepreneurs are almost totally shut out of vital decisions. Dominic Cummings, a special adviser to UK education minister Michael Gove, discusses technological advances quantum computing, 3D printing, energetics etc. Some thoughts on education and political priorities Summary Although we understand some systems well enough to make precise or statistical predictions, most interesting systems - whether physical, mental, cultural, or virtual - are complex, nonlinear, and have properties that emerge from feedback between many interactions. Cummings and Yang share a contempt for elites who refuse to engage with the voting public.
The Duke of Wellington once remarked that the battle plans of Napoleon were made of marble, whereas his own were made of little bits of string. However, they all shared one fatal flaw: if one little bit went wrong then the whole edifice came crashing down. Wellington said that his own battle plans were different: if one string broke, he would merely knot two other strings together and the plan would continue on. An awful lot. From a very wide range of authors. But it also gives the impression of being no more than an energetic exercise in quote mining, and not a dispassionate investigation of the issues.
See what's new with book lending at the Internet Archive. Search icon An illustration of a magnifying glass. User icon An illustration of a person's head and chest. Sign up Log in. Web icon An illustration of a computer application window Wayback Machine Texts icon An illustration of an open book.
Some thoughts on education and political priorities. Summary. Although and the way they make decisions and priorities. We already have a data every hour. (Source: hampdenlodgethame.org) Dominic Cummings. Version 2.
Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Email Address. Posted in: Political ideologies , UK politics. Some years ago I wrote a blog on Dominic Cummings, an adviser to Michael Gove and one of the key architects of the Leave campaign. The blog focused on a long essay he had published on leaving the Department for Education.
Yet, all the same, two hands, they are a lot.
Although the fact that it took place in the context of the broader Coronavirus crisis meant that it received relatively little publicity or attention, the central argument of this article is that the lecture provides great insight into the ideas shaping government policy, in general, and into the inner mind of Dominic Cummings, in particular. The Ditchley Annual Lecture dates back over fifty years and is used to focus attention on a specific pressing theme, to build a network of interested people and to draw new talent into future debates and discussions. To review the list of previous lecturers and topics is to look upon an incredibly distinguished list of speakers exploring some of the most profound issues facing humanity. This failure to follow traditional conventional courtesy is, we suggest, symptomatic of a deeper strain of thinking that imbues this lecture and which urgently needs to be foregrounded as part of a broader debate about the future of democracy, civil service reform and the role of technology at the intersection between the governors and the governed. Indeed, what makes the Ditchley Lecture particularly significant is that, despite its best efforts, it does not stand alone and is in fact a key element of a broader process through which core members of the current government are seeking to develop, refine and most of all test out their ideas about the nature and scope of the reform agenda they feel is necessary. Let us be very clear from the outset: although Michael Gove may have stood at the lectern or possibly in the context of Covid been digitally channelled to his distributed audience at the agreed time this was not his lecture; the lecture has a schizophrenic quality, as we will illustrate, in the sense that some sections possess a clear and calm quality whereas others adopt a rather frenzied and deeply disruptive quality.
Metrics details. The article generated on-line reader comments from the public. Findings offer some insight into the challenges involved in conducting public discourse about the relevance of genes in education. For reasons both historical and conceptual, genetic science is often misunderstood by the general public Tabery There is a false but widespread belief that traits that show genetic influence are in some way pre-determined and unmalleable.
Before the coronavirus crisis, academics in higher education were preparing for an intensification of the culture wars, when left-wing academics are denounced by right-wing politicians and their supporters as purveyors of communist propaganda Dickinson
Internal audit manual for microfinance institutions pdf target times pdf free downloadReply